Bitcoin Mining Earnings Calculator
Estimate your daily Bitcoin earnings based on your hashrate and mining pool selection
Choosing the wrong mining pool can cost you thousands in lost earnings each month. It’s not just about fees-it’s about stability, transparency, and matching your setup to the right pool. Here’s how to make the right choice.
Why Mining Pools Matter
Solo Bitcoin mining is nearly impossible today. The network’s hash rate has skyrocketed, making it too hard for individual miners to find blocks alone. Mining pools solve this by combining resources. When you join a pool, your computer works with others to solve blocks. Rewards are split based on your contribution. Without a pool, you’d likely never earn Bitcoin.
Key Factors to Consider
When picking a mining pool, focus on these five areas.
Fees: Most pools charge 1-4% of your rewards. Foundry USA charges 1.5%, while Binance Pool has just 0.99%. But don’t pick based on fees alone. Some pools hide costs like withdrawal fees or penalties for stale shares. Check the fine print.
Payout structures: There are three main types. Full Pay Per Share (FPPS) gives steady payments but higher fees. Pay Per Share Plus (PPS+) includes transaction fees for better returns. Pay Per Last N Shares (PPLNS) offers bigger payouts when the pool finds a block but with more variance. For most miners, PPS+ strikes the best balance.
Hash rate and market share: Larger pools like Foundry USA A leading Bitcoin mining pool with 256.3 EH/s hash rate and 26.6% market share as of 2025 find blocks more often, giving you regular payments. Smaller pools like BraiinsPool A Bitcoin mining pool with 14 EH/s hash rate and 1.46% market share, known for open-source software have fewer blocks but larger individual rewards when they succeed. Koinly’s 2025 data shows Foundry USA handles 256.3 EH/s, AntPool at 178.4 EH/s, and Binance Pool at 68.2 EH/s.
Uptime and server location: A pool with 99% uptime is essential. Even a 1% downtime means lost mining time. Choose pools with servers near your location to reduce latency. For example, if you’re in New Zealand, a pool with servers in Asia will give better connection speeds than one in Europe.
Transparency: Reputable pools show real-time dashboards, share statistics, and clear payout calculations. If a pool hides its hash rate or block finds, avoid it. ViaBTC’s dashboard updates every 15 seconds, while some shady pools only report earnings weekly.
Top Mining Pools Compared
| Pool Name | Fee | Hash Rate (EH/s) | Market Share | Payout Structure | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foundry USA A leading Bitcoin mining pool with 256.3 EH/s hash rate and 26.6% market share as of 2025 | 1.5% | 256.3 | 26.6% | PPS+ | Largest pool, reliable payouts |
| AntPool A Bitcoin mining pool operated by Bitmain with 178.4 EH/s hash rate and 17.96% market share | 1.6% | 178.4 | 17.96% | PPLNS | High block find rate |
| Binance Pool Integrated with Binance exchange, 68.2 EH/s hash rate and 7.04% market share | 0.99% | 68.2 | 7.04% | PPS+ | User-friendly interface for beginners |
| F2Pool Supports multiple cryptocurrencies, 102.9 EH/s hash rate and 10.68% market share | 1.2% | 102.9 | 10.68% | FPPS | Easy setup for new miners |
| ViaBTC 113.7 EH/s hash rate and 13.69% market share, supports multiple coins | 1.0% | 113.7 | 13.69% | PPLNS | Real-time dashboard updates every 15 seconds |
| Luxor 44 EH/s hash rate and 4.56% market share, transparent reporting | 1.2% | 44 | 4.56% | FPPS | Detailed payout analytics |
| BraiinsPool 14 EH/s hash rate and 1.46% market share, open-source software | 1.58% | 14 | 1.46% | PPS+ | Community-driven development |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Don’t just chase low fees-hidden costs can eat your profits. Avoid pools with poor uptime; even brief outages reduce your earnings. Never ignore payout thresholds-some pools require 0.005 BTC before paying out, which can delay cash flow for small miners. Also, check community feedback; if miners complain about delayed payments, move on. A pool with great stats but no transparency isn’t worth it.
Setting Up Your Pool
Most pools require registering an account, creating a worker, and configuring your miner with the pool’s server address and port. For example, to connect to Binance Pool, use stratum+tcp://btc.poolbinance.com:3333 as the server. Your worker name is your Bitcoin wallet address. Once set up, monitor your dashboard for hash rate and shares. Beginners should start with Binance Pool or F2Pool-their interfaces are simple and require minimal technical knowledge.
Future Trends
Mining pools are getting more specialized. Some now support multiple cryptocurrencies, while others focus solely on Bitcoin. Regulatory changes may affect pool operations in certain countries. Always stay updated and be ready to switch pools as the market evolves. Experts predict smaller, more agile pools will grow as hardware improves, but the top 5 pools will still control most of the network hash rate.
What’s the best mining pool for beginners?
Binance Pool is ideal for beginners due to its low fees (0.99%), simple setup, and integration with the Binance exchange. Their user-friendly dashboard provides clear stats and real-time updates without technical jargon. Start with Binance Pool, then explore others as you gain experience.
How often do mining pools pay out?
Payout frequency varies. Pools like Foundry USA pay daily once you hit the threshold (0.001 BTC), while others like AntPool use PPLNS and pay out when blocks are found, which can be every few days. Check the pool’s payout rules before joining-some require minimum balances before processing payments.
Should I choose a large or small mining pool?
Large pools (like Foundry USA) offer steady, frequent payouts but smaller individual rewards. Small pools (like BraiinsPool) pay out less often but give larger shares when they find blocks. If you prefer consistency, go big. If you’re okay with risk for higher rewards, try smaller pools. Most miners split their hashrate between two pools to balance both benefits.
What’s the difference between PPLNS and PPS+?
PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) pays based on your recent contributions during a block cycle. It offers higher rewards when the pool finds a block but creates variable payouts. PPS+ (Pay Per Share Plus) guarantees payment for each share you submit, including transaction fees. PPS+ is more stable but usually has slightly higher fees. For most miners, PPS+ provides better predictability without sacrificing too much earnings.
Can I switch mining pools easily?
Yes! Switching is simple-just update your miner’s configuration with the new pool’s server details. Most miners test multiple pools for a week or two before settling. If a pool’s uptime drops or fees change, switch immediately. Don’t wait for your rewards to disappear.
People Comments
They don’t tell you that the biggest pools are actually run by the same shadowy syndicate.
When you look past the glossy marketing, you realise that many so‑called “independent” pools share the same infrastructure. It’s a subtle hint that the centralization risk is deeper than we admit. I’m not saying there’s a grand conspiracy, but the pattern is hard to ignore. Still, the data you shared about fees and uptime does help an average miner make a more informed choice.
Thank you for compiling such a thorough overview; it provides a solid foundation for anyone navigating the mining pool landscape. I appreciate the clear delineation of fee structures, as many newcomers overlook hidden costs that can erode profitability. Your discussion of payout models-FPPS, PPS+, and PPLNS-helps demystify the trade‑offs between variance and predictability. The emphasis on hash rate and market share is particularly relevant, given that larger pools tend to offer more frequent payouts. However, I would caution that sheer size does not guarantee transparency, and attentive miners should still verify the pool’s reporting practices. The section on uptime is well‑placed; a 99 % uptime figure translates to a tangible loss of earnings if the pool experiences frequent outages. Regarding server location, your suggestion to select geographically proximate servers aligns with best‑practice latency reduction. The transparency criteria you listed-real‑time dashboards and open statistics-are indeed markers of reputable pools. I also found the comparison table useful, though it could benefit from a column indicating average payout latency. Your note on common mistakes, especially the warning against hidden withdrawal fees, is a reminder that fine print matters. The guidance on initial setup, with explicit stratum URLs, reduces the barrier for beginners. I am particularly intrigued by your observation that regulatory shifts may impact pool operations in certain jurisdictions; staying informed is essential. The future trends you outlined-specialized pools and the potential rise of agile, smaller operators-paint an optimistic picture for diversity. Overall, the guide balances technical detail with practical advice, which I find both accessible and actionable. Thank you again for this valuable contribution to the mining community.
Pick a pool with solid uptime and low hidden fees, otherwise you’ll waste hash power.
It’s another generic list; nothing new.
Congratulations on rediscovering information that has been publicly available for years; truly groundbreaking work.
Hey folks, great read! I love how you broke down the pool options with such vivid detail-makes the whole mining maze feel like a sunny garden rather than a dark cave. Your tip about mixing pools to balance risk and reward is especially clever, and I’ll definitely experiment with a split‑hash strategy. Keep sprinkling those practical nuggets, and the community will keep thriving.
While your enthusiasm is noted, let’s keep the drama to a minimum and focus on the factual nuances you’ve already outlined.
Oh my god, this guide is like a blockbuster movie! The plot twists about hidden fees had my heart racing, and the climax when you revealed the best beginner pool? Pure cinematic gold! I’m practically swooning over those payout tables.
Honestly this shit is a waste of time. You cant even get the facts straight and the writing is all over the place. Get a grip and stop spitting nonsense.
From a technical standpoint, the guide hits the key performance indicators miners care about: fee efficiency, block propagation latency, and pool hash‑rate distribution. By integrating the stratum endpoints directly into your mining software configuration, you minimize handshake overhead, which can shave off precious milliseconds-especially crucial in high‑difficulty networks. Moreover, monitoring the pool’s real‑time dashboard via API calls enables you to programmatically adjust your worker allocation, optimizing for both payout variance and overall profitability. If you’re operating ASICs with power constraints, consider the pool’s transaction fee reimbursement model, as PPS+ often compensates for the extra energy consumption during share submission. Lastly, stay abreast of regional regulatory developments; certain jurisdictions impose reporting requirements that could affect pool accessibility. Integrating these considerations will position you for sustainable long‑term returns.
Don’t trust any of those pools-they’re all in cahoots with the big banks to keep us miners in debt. The so‑called “transparent dashboards” are just smoke screens.
Overall, the pool selection matrix you presented aligns well with industry benchmarks. For miners seeking low latency, prioritize pools with edge servers close to your ISP’s PoP. For those optimizing for fee structures, PPS+ typically offers the best net hash‑rate efficiency after accounting for transaction reimbursements. Keep an eye on upcoming EIP‑1559 adjustments, as they may shift the economics of transaction fee payouts, influencing pool profitability models.